Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 07:22:02 +0900 (JST) From: <seki@neutrino.kek.jp> To: Makoto Sakuda <sakuda@neutrino.kek.jp> cc: opc.nuint01@neutrino.kek.jp Subject: Re: Length of the paper Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020105071033.29390A-100000@neutrino.kek.jp> Sakuda san, I think the allocation of 6 pages per talk in the theoretical benchmark calculation session would be appropriate. Regarding my summary talk, I remind you that I did delegate the summary talk to Vijay but no time was given to him at the meeting. Sorry about the delay in responding to your e-mail. I had to meet the deadlines of two proposals in the last one week. Seki On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Makoto Sakuda wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > Although I am very glad to hear that a possible financial problem > will be taken care of by the cooperative contributions from > us later, we still need to give authors a guideline for the page limit. > > I changed the length of a paper in MC generator/Benchmark/Panel > Session to 6 pages. I wait for Seki-san's response for > Benchmark Session. > > Please look at epscrc2.ps or epscrc2.pdf and check the length. > I have conformed that the size of a page is almost identical to that of > Physics Letters B (Elsevier). 6 pages is the average size of > a paper in Physics Letters B. You can imagine the length. > > Conveners of Sessions, please check and acknowledge. > > Regards, > Makoto Sakuda >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Sat Jan 05 2002 - 07:22:04 JST