Message-Id: <200112271124.UAA00435@neutrino.kek.jp> To: Yoshinari.Hayato@kek.jp Cc: opc.nuint01@neutrino.kek.jp Subject: Re: Length of the paper Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 20:24:37 +0900 From: Makoto Sakuda <sakuda@neutrino.kek.jp> > To: sakuda@neutrino.kek.jp > Subject: Re: Length of the paper > From: Yoshinari.Hayato@kek.jp > In-Reply-To: <200112270854.RAA31726@neutrino.kek.jp> > References: <200112270854.RAA31726@neutrino.kek.jp> > Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:43:52 +0900 > Sender: hayato@neutrino.kek.jp > > Dear Sakuda-san, > > I could not read the e-mail because I was on the way > to Kamioka. > > >The cost (43 Euro/copy) stays constant if the total number of pages > >is less than 380, according to Hayato. > > Basically, the expected number of pages is not 380 but > 350 and the upper limit is an assumption from the other > conference. ( I have not received the agreement from > Elsevier.) > > As for the number of pages, the instruction for the > authors will be prepared by the editor in Elsevier in > the beginning of January. Therefore, it may be better > to be simple.(2 pages per 10 minutes or something like > that) Hi, I think that the publisher does not care about the page size of the each speaker, but it cares only about the total number of pages. The publisher must be happy if we give it the list of the pages for each speaker. It saves time. If you apply a simple rule (2pages/10min) to all the talks, the number of pages for MC generator/Benchmark will be 3-4 pages. I am afraid that it may be a bit too short, considering the content. Since the deadline of the manuscript is the end of February, we might as well define the length of the talk now and let speakers know the schedule. Some of the speakers want to write the manuscript during the holidays. Regards, Makoto Sakuda
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Thu Dec 27 2001 - 20:24:38 JST