The first draft of planning Sessions 5 and 6

From: seki@neutrino.kek.jp
Date: Fri Aug 31 2001 - 18:52:41 JST

  • Next message: Makoto Sakuda: "Next OPC meeting on Sep.8 (Sat), 8am-" 

    Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:52:41 +0900 (JST)
From: <seki@neutrino.kek.jp>
To: opc.nuint01@neutrino.kek.jp
Subject: The first draft of planning Sessions 5 and 6
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95LJ1.1b3.1010831184615.25931D-100000@neutrino.kek.jp>

Folks,
I have given some (initial) thought to Sessions 5 and 6 (Benchmark+Pannel
Discussions) and have composed the first planning draft.  Please give me
your comments/suggestions/advise/criticism, so that we can have a better 
plan to be discussed at the opc TV conference on Sept. 8.
Thanks.
Seki
p.s. I hate "attachments" in e-mails.

**********************************
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\addtolength{\textheight}{1in}
\addtolength{\textwidth}{1in}
\addtolength{\topmargin}{-0.5in}
\addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.5in}
\pagestyle{empty}

\begin{document}
\noindent
{\bf A. 
Benchmark MC and Theoretical Calculations 
of $\nu_\mu-{}^{16}{\rm O}$ Reactions
}
\begin{itemize}
 \item Guidelines
    \begin{itemize}
       \item Make the binning size as small as possible.
       \item Draw straight plots (neither semi-log, nor log plots).
       \item Use the neutrino-nucleon cross section as specified in the attach 
             (not shown yet).
     \end{itemize}


  \item[\bf 1. ] $(\nu_\mu,\mu^-)$ inclusive. \\
     \begin{itemize}
        \item[\bf a.] Two figures for $E_\nu =$ 1.0 and 2.0 GeV each\\ 
                      $\frac{d\sigma}{d E_\mu}$ 
                      as a function of $E_\mu$ from 0 to 1.0 GeV. 
        \item[\bf b.] Two figures for $E_\nu =$ 1.0 and 2.0 GeV each\\ 
                      $\frac{d\sigma}{4\pi d(\cos\theta_\mu)}$ 
                      as a function of $\theta_\mu$ from 0 to 60 degree. 
        \item[\bf c.] Two figures for $E_\nu =$ 1.0 and 2.0 GeV each\\
                      $\frac{d^2\sigma}{4\pi d(\cos\theta_\mu)d E_\mu}$ 
                      at $\theta_\mu = 30{}^o$ \\
                      as a function of $E_\nu - E_\mu$ from 0 to 500 MeV.
      \end{itemize}

  \item[\bf 2. ] $(\nu_\mu,\mu^-p)$ semi-inclusive\\
     \begin{itemize}
        \item[\bf a.] Two figures for $E_\nu =$ 1.0 and 2.0 GeV each\\
                      $\frac{d\sigma}{d^3p_p}$ ($d^3\vec{k}_\mu$ integrated)
                      at $\theta_p =$ 60${}^o$ \\ 
                      as a function of $|\vec{p}_p|$ from 0 to 500 MeV/c.
        \item[\bf b.] Two figures for $E_\nu =$ 1.0 and 2.0 GeV each\\
                      $\frac{d\sigma}{d^3p_p}$ ($d^3\vec{k}_\mu$ integrated)
                      at $|\vec{p}_p|=$ 500 MeV \\
                      as a function of $\theta_p$from 0 to 90${}^o$.
     \end{itemize}
  \item[\bf 3. ] Pion production 
     \begin{itemize}
        \item (to be shown)
     \end{itemize}

\end{itemize}


\bigskip
\bigskip
\bigskip

%\input{bench.tex}
%
%
% figure
%
\begin{picture}(0,0)%
\epsfig{file=bench.ps,scale=0.5}%
\end{picture}%
%\setlength{\unitlength}{3947sp}%
\setlength{\unitlength}{2000sp}%
%
\begingroup\makeatletter\ifx\SetFigFont\undefined%
\gdef\SetFigFont#1#2#3#4#5{%
  \reset@font\fontsize{#1}{#2pt}%
  \fontfamily{#3}\fontseries{#4}\fontshape{#5}%
  \selectfont}%
\fi\endgroup%
\begin{picture}(6143,3597)(1455,-3433)
\put(7201,-3361){\makebox(0,0)[lb]{\smash{\SetFigFont{20}{24.0}{\rmdefault}{\mddefault}{\updefault}$\vec{p}_p$}}}
\put(1951,-961){\makebox(0,0)[lb]{\smash{\SetFigFont{20}{24.0}{\rmdefault}{\mddefault}{\updefault}$\nu$}}}
\put(5476,-361){\makebox(0,0)[lb]{\smash{\SetFigFont{20}{24.0}{\rmdefault}{\mddefault}{\updefault}$\mu^-$}}}
\put(5776,-1261){\makebox(0,0)[lb]{\smash{\SetFigFont{20}{24.0}{\rmdefault}{\mddefault}{\updefault}$\theta_\mu$}}}
\put(7501,-136){\makebox(0,0)[lb]{\smash{\SetFigFont{20}{24.0}{\rmdefault}{\mddefault}{\updefault}$\vec{k}_\mu$}}}
\put(5926,-2011){\makebox(0,0)[lb]{\smash{\SetFigFont{20}{24.0}{\rmdefault}{\mddefault}{\updefault}$\theta_p$}}}
\put(5551,-2986){\makebox(0,0)[lb]{\smash{\SetFigFont{20}{24.0}{\rmdefault}{\mddefault}{\updefault}$p$}}}
\end{picture}

\vfill\eject

\noindent
{\bf B. Format and List of Participants
}

\begin{itemize}
 \item Guidelines
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Keep showing all (or as many as possible) relevant plots 
              for comparison by using as many projected screens as possible. 
        \item Also use one standard OHP for lay-over presentations as needed 
              during the two sessions. 
        \item Accept as many comments and questions as possible from the 
              audience at any time during the sessions. 
    \end{itemize}
 \item {\bf Session 5.} (Chair, Seki; Associate Chair, Y. Hayato) \\
                    Results of the benchmark calculations are presented by:
   \begin{itemize} 
     \item Monte Carlo
           \begin{itemize}
            \item NEUT
            \item NUANCE
            \item MINOS/Soudan II
            \item OPERA/NOMAD/DONUT
           \end{itemize}
     \item Theoretical calculations
           \begin{itemize} 
            \item J. Marteau
            \item E. Paschos
            \item H. Nakamura
            \item plus?          
           \end{itemize}
    \end{itemize}
 \item {\bf Session 6.} (Chair, Seki; Associate Chair, D. Jasper) \\
                   Panel discussions are carried out by:
   \begin{itemize}
     \item  V. R. Pandharipande
     \item  P. Vogel
     \item  K. Kubodera
     \item  K. Langanke
     \item  G. Garvey
     \item  plus?
   \end{itemize}
 \end{itemize} 
\end{document}

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 18:52:42 JST