Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 07:22:34 +0900 (JST) From: <seki@neutrino.kek.jp> To: Dave Casper <casper@neutrino.kek.jp>, Yoshinari Hayato <hayato@neutrino.kek.jp> cc: opc.nuint01@neutrino.kek.jp Subject: Benchmark calc. Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95LJ1.1b3.1011110070322.15614A-100000@neutrino.kek.jp> Hello, I have three questions regarding the benchmark calculations (of both MC and theory): 1) Should we change the last part of the title of the benchmark calc. listing in the NuInt01 HP, to "\nu_\mu Charge-Current Reactions," as I brought it up at our last TV conference? 2) Should we ask those who are doing benchmark calc to prepare their figures in a predetermined size (so that we could superimpose their transparencies if needed), and if so, what is the best size? 3) Since success of the panel discussion will depends on whether the discussion leaders could get the results of benchmark calculations beforehand, it'd be preferable to collect the results ahead of the time. It'd be difficult to achieve this, but what'd be the optimum, practical length of time ahead of their presentation? A few weeks, a week before the workshop, upon their arrival, or by the evening of Dec. 14? We could simply distribute an e-mail to request these to them, for example. Please let have your wisdom on this (and very soon.) Seki
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Sat Nov 10 2001 - 07:22:35 JST