Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:29:09 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200110110329.MAA19171@psux1.kek.jp> From: kenzo.nakamura@kek.jp To: sakuda@neutrino.kek.jp Cc: opc.nuint01@neutrino.kek.jp Subject: Re: krmpotic francisco: nuin01.abstract.ps Dear Sakuda-san: Once we decide to display contributed papers (I agree to Sakuda-san's proposal), we do not need to bother about accepting or rejecting each contribution. Probably we need to discuss whether or not we should reserve some contributions for oral presentation, replacing last-moment cancellation. In such cases, giving more time to already scheduled talks is another, probably better, solution. Regards, Kenzo Nakamura In article <200110102342.IAA05779@neutrino.kek.jp> sakuda@neutrino.kek.jp writes: >> Dear OPC members, >> >> Do we accept it as a contributed paper? >> >> Krmpotic et al, >> Neutrino-C12 interactions within the PQRPA. >> >> "The C12(nu-e,e-)N12 and C12(nu-e,mu-)N12 cross sections are >> just tools in neutrino oscillation experiments with liquid >> scintillators. As such, and to be useful, they must be >> accurately accounted for by nuclear structure models. >> ..... >> A thorough discussion of weak observables in C12 within the >> PQRPA is presented. " >> >> Regards, >> M.Sakuda >>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Thu Oct 11 2001 - 12:26:53 JST