RE: OPC meeting

From: Jorge_G_Morfin (morfin@fnal.gov)
Date: Tue Aug 28 2001 - 04:41:10 JST

  • Next message: Alice Maretin: "Your Status #235E"

    Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:41:10 -0500
    From: Jorge_G_Morfin <morfin@fnal.gov>
    To: Dave Casper <dcasper@uci.edu>
    cc: "'Makoto Sakuda'" <sakuda@neutrino.kek.jp>, <opc.nuint01@neutrino.kek.jp>
    Subject: RE: OPC meeting
    Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.31.0108271429050.6076565-100000@fsgi01.fnal.gov>
    
    Hello Dave,
    
        Thank you for your suggestions regarding Neutrino/Nucleus Theory.
        I am happy to say that, knowing how busy Manny Paschos is, I already
    invited him and he has accepted to attend and address the Workshop.  I
    also had both Marteau and Delorme as well as Vogel on the short list of
    speakers I sent to my co-conveners early this morning for consideration.
        I am all for inviting both Marteau and Delorme to participate although
    finite time would probably allow only one to speak.  A consideration might
    be Marteau to speak and Delorme for the panel discussion...  We'll prepare
    and circulate our recommendations before the video-conference.
    
    							Best regards,
    							   Jorge
    
    On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Dave Casper wrote:
    
    >
    > 	Sakuda-san, et al.,
    >
    > The proposed outline for the program looks good to me, although I have
    > two suggestions.
    >
    > First, add to Item #5 (comparison of Monte Carlos) an explicit mention
    > of the goal of producing a universal Monte Carlo program akin to Lund.
    > I think this is essential for future progress and is a natural long-term
    > goal for us.
    >
    > Second, add to Item #4 (Neutrino-Nucleus Review) an explicit mention of
    > the goal of collecting first a comprehensive list of references to all
    > existing neutrino data, and for the longer term, putting as much data as
    > possible into some kind of computer-accessible database.
    >
    > With regard to both these items, I think it is good to set goals for
    > producing concrete, tangible results so that (unlike too many
    > conferences) we do not talk forever and in the end accomplish little of
    > lasting value.  Our meeting is quite unique in the sense that we have an
    > opportunity to produce results which will be of enormous importance to
    > all neutrino experiments for many years.  Of course, we will not achieve
    > these goals in one meeting, but in my opinion we should use this first
    > workshop to plan specific future steps toward them.
    >
    > A video conference would be great - barring another explosion in our
    > lab, I am available anytime for the next month.
    >
    > I have a few suggestions concerning possible speakers:
    >
    > 1) Neutrino/Nucleus Theory:  The most recent and comprehensive work I am
    > aware of is the work of Jacques Marteau from Lyon (Nucl.Phys A663: 783
    > (2000)).  This was his PhD thesis, and I suspect he has moved on to
    > something else since then, but either he or his thesis advisor (J.
    > Delorme) may be worth inviting.  There is also Peter Vogel from Caltech.
    >
    > 2) Concerning final-state interactions, Paschos, Pasquali and Yu have
    > written a couple papers over the past ~year (see hep-ph/0107261 and
    > hep-ph/0005255) which are directly relevant to this question.  We might
    > invite one of them.  I think Paschos is at IAS(Princeton) and the other
    > two are at Dortmund.
    >
    > 3) I hope my friend (and HARP colleague) Piero Zucchelli, who wrote the
    > neutrino MC for Chorus, will be able to attend and participate in the MC
    > comparison.  I will invite him today.  Since he has recently proposed a
    > novel low-energy neutrino beam (using relativistic Helium-6 ions as the
    > source) for oscillation experiments, I think he is quite interested in
    > the subject of our meeting.
    >
    > Best regards,
    >
    > Dave
    > dcasper@uci.edu
    >
    >
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Tue Aug 28 2001 - 04:41:16 JST