Re: Minutes of SciFi weekly meeting (00/Aug/13)

From: Makoto Sakuda (sakuda@neutrino.kek.jp)
Date: Tue Aug 15 2000 - 10:41:52 JST

  • Next message: Makoto Sakuda: "Minutes of SciFi weekly meeting (00/Aug/28)"

    Message-Id: <200008150141.KAA19732@neutrino.kek.jp>
    Subject: Re: Minutes of SciFi weekly meeting (00/Aug/13) 
    Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:41:52 +0900
    From: Makoto Sakuda <sakuda@neutrino.kek.jp>
    
    > To: sakuda@neutrino.kek.jp
    > Cc: e362scifi@neutrino.kek.jp
    > Subject: Re: Minutes of SciFi weekly meeting (00/Aug/13)
    > From: Yoshinari.Hayato@kek.jp
    > In-Reply-To: <200008141149.UAA14698@neutrino.kek.jp>
    > References: <200008141149.UAA14698@neutrino.kek.jp>
    > X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA)
    > Mime-Version: 1.0
    > 
    > Dear all,
    > 
    >  Could someone report the current status of Monte-Carlo of
    > the Scifi-detector and the related projects? I heard that
    > the electronics simulation part has been separated. Then,
    > you can start the more systematic study related to the 
    > possible sources of systematic errors such as IIT and elctronic
    > noises, changes of gains gain and so on.
    > 
    >  Regards,
    >    Yoshinari Hayato
    
    Hi,
    
    The systematic study of tracking and simulation is the main 
    topics of the SciFi meeting for the next collaboration meeting.
    
    Steve who made the scheme is testing it and Iwashita/Ishida will work on it
    too. Your comments are welcome.
    
    Regards,
    M.Sakuda
    -----------------
    Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 08:27:02 +0900 (JST)
    From: Steve Boyd <boyd@neutrino.kek.jp>
    X-Sender: boyd@nurock.kek.jp
    To: Yoshinari.Hayato@kek.jp
    cc: sakuda@neutrino.kek.jp, e362scifi@neutrino.kek.jp
    Subject: Re: Minutes of SciFi weekly meeting (00/Aug/13)
    In-Reply-To: <20000815074146Y.hayato@neutrino.kek.jp>
    Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000815082301.23301E-100000@nurock.kek.jp>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
    
    
    The simulation of the pixel clusters has been separated from the
    tracking of the particles. In principle one can now read in the
    same energy deposition and use different gains to estimate tracking
    efficiency systematic errors. I am attempting to do this (crudely
    at first) by looking at a DOPX=4 and DOPX=3 sample of the same MC
    sample. Since the algorithms are so different I would think that 
    the difference in the tracking efficiencies from these is a conservative
    estimate of the tracking efficiency systematic error due to gain
    differences. 
    
    Steve
    --
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 10:42:00 JST