1st draft of SciBar coherent pion papert

From: Masaya HASEGAWA (masaya@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp)
Date: Tue Apr 05 2005 - 22:32:37 JST

  • Next message: Yoshinari.Hayato@kek.jp: "A blind carbon copy"

    Subject: 1st draft of SciBar coherent pion papert 
    From: Masaya HASEGAWA <masaya@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
    Message-ID: <050405223237.M0318917@k2k10.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
    Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:32:37 +0900
    
    
     Dear K2K Collaborators,
     
     We are very sorry for this delayed announcement, 
    but now the first draft of coherent paper is ready 
    for the internal review by collaboration.
     
     You can download the manuscript from:
     http://neutrino.kek.jp/internal/papers/coherent/
     
     This draft is written based on the results presented 
    at the last collaboration meeting in Stony Brook.
     
     ******************************
     Please send your comments to
     coherentpaper@neutrino.kek.jp
     BEFORE 
     Apr. 19 (Tue.) 23:59.
     ******************************
     
     Some comments from the committee follow:
     
     -- At this moment, the author list and acknowledgment 
     are just taken from recent nu_mu disappearance oscillation paper.
     
     -- One of Committee members was concerned about 
     calculation of upper limit presented in this paper. 
       According to the suggestion, we calculated an upper 
     limit using another method described in PRD67, 012002 (2003). 
       We estimate an upper limit of signal events using the number 
     of observed events, signal efficiency, expected background 
     and their uncertainty, but neglecting the correlation between 
     systematic uncertainties, because it would take several more 
     months to evaluate.
       In the end, we find a 90% C.L. upper limit of coherent pion 
     production is 114.9 events.
       This corresponds to an upper limit of 6.7x10^-3 for 
     cross-section ratio to the total CC, which is about 10% higher 
     than the number in the draft (6.0x10^-3).
     
       The difference seen by two methods is order of 10% and will 
     not change the physics objective of this paper, while we need 
     several more months to completely evaluate the upper limit 
     taking the correlation into account.
       Thus, considering the importance of our result and available 
     manpower, we want to publish the paper with the original number 
     as calculated by Hasegawa as soon as possible, although one of 
     committee member is still concerned that careful referee of the 
     journal may comment on this topic and we are aware of this issue.
     
     SciBar coherent pion paper committee
     M.Hasegawa, T.Kutter, F.Sanchez, T.Sato, L.Whitehead, M.Yokoyama
     
    
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Tue Apr 05 2005 - 22:39:58 JST