Re: Possible K2K anti-neutrino run in 2005

From: NAKAYA Tsuyoshi (nakaya@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp)
Date: Fri Dec 17 2004 - 23:13:53 JST

  • Next message: Takashi Kobayashi: "Re: 忘年会(nuG year end party)"

    Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20041217224709.0292f8f0@pop.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
    Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:13:53 +0900
    From: NAKAYA Tsuyoshi <nakaya@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
    Subject: Re: Possible K2K anti-neutrino run in 2005
    
      Dear John and K2K collaborators,
    
     >
     >While in principle anti-neutrino running is a great idea, my reaction is
     >that it is impractical and perhaps a waste of resources due to low rates.
     >Two months of data will amount to how many events?
     >
     >It is my fault for not following the discussions in which you all have
     >doubtless discussed this issue.  Can someone point me towards a report
     >whee this is justified?
     >
    
    I will attach the part of the minutes of the last K2K conveners meeting.
    
    In addition, I list how many events are expected with anti-neutrino run at 
    the end
    of this e-mail.
    
    By the way, please note that we have still several hurdles to clear to get 
    the approval
    and we have many severe boundary conditions, too.
    
    Regards,
    T. Nakaya
    
    +++ A part of the minutes of K2K conveners meeting on Dec. 15th, +++
    
     >
     >**********************************************************************
     >Date & Time :   12/15 (Wed)   [~8:50]9:00-11:00
     >Place;		Kamioka-Kashiwa-KEK-Kyoto-Tohoku-Hiroshima-USA-EU-.........
     >Type;		IP conference (KEK MCU with ID=24346
     >		KEK person: Please make a reservation).
     >**********************************************************************
     >
    
    The presentation files are
    http://neutrino.kek.jp/internal/conveners/meeting/041215/
    
     >
     >======== The agenda is ============
     >
     >1. K2K run plan in 2005		          10 min.		K. Nishikawa
    http://neutrino.kek.jp/internal/conveners/meeting/041215/k2k2005.pdf
    
    The horn trouble in November 2004 is reported.
    The K2K run plan in 2005 is proposed with anti-neutrinos for two months
    to measure the NC coherent pi^0 production.
      All conveners attending the meeting agree with the proposal.
    
     >   1.1  K2K anti-neutrino beam			10 min.		K. Hiraide
    http://neutrino.kek.jp/internal/conveners/meeting/041215/anti-nu_hiraide.pdf
      The anti-neutrino beam configuration and the expected beam flux are presented.
    The new first horn is installed downstream of the current second horn,
    and delivers the 40% neutrino flux relative to the original K2K dual-horn system.
      The neutrino flux in the anti-neutrino beam is as low as 5%.
    
     >   1.2  Physics sensitivity			10 min.		Y. Hayato
    http://neutrino.kek.jp/internal/conveners/meeting/041215/anti-nu_hayato.ppt
    
      With the anti-neutrino beam for two month data taking, we search for the
    NC coherent pi^0 production. At the K2K meeting at Stony Brook,
    the SciBar group presented no CC coherent pi production in K2K,
    which indicates the measured cross section is less than 25% of
    the Rein and Sehgal model prediction.
    In the K2K extension, we search for the NC coherent pi^0 production
    in 1KT as well as a search for the anti-neutrino CC coherent pi production 
    in SciBar.
    In the region of cos_theta_beam>0.6, we expect 13.8 coherent pi^0 events
    over 17.4 background pi^0 events with one month data of 5E18 POT in the 50 
    ton fiducial
    volume of 1KT. In SciBar, we expect 3.5 coherent pi^+ events over 2 
    background events with
    5E18 POT (1 month).
      So we will have the conclusive result on the coherent pi production in 
    the K2K beam energy.
    
     >   1.3  Discussion				10 min.		all
    There is a question what shall we do to make the proposal approved.
    Basically, we just wait for the KEK decision.
    
    ================= Anti-neutrino statistics  =====================
    Assumption: two month run (1E19 POT)
    
    [1] SciBar; 10 ton fiducial volume;
    Total;			~700
    CC
       CCQE		257
       CC1pi		130
       CC-coherent pi	32
       CC-DIS		69
    NC
       Elastic		103
       1pi(charged)		26
       1pi^0			42
       coherent		16
       other		26
    
       * Note: The SciBar efficiency is around 70%. So we will observe ~500 events.
    
    [2] 1KT, 50 ton fiducial volume
    Total;			~3400
    CC
       CCQE		1285
       CC1pi		626
       CC-coherent pi	122
       CC-DIS		340
    NC
       Elastic		504
       1pi(charged)		134
       1pi^0			203
       coherent		66
       other		121
    
    [3] The number of reconstructed pi^0 in 1KT
    Total;			~130
    NC
       resonance		 57
       coherent		 33.2
       DIS			 29
    CC			 12
    
      * Note, if we have selected the forward region, the coherent pi^0/all 
    pi^0 ratio is 45%.
    
    by TN 
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Fri Dec 17 2004 - 23:20:12 JST