Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:57:20 -1000 (HST) From: "John G. Learned" <jgl@phys.hawaii.edu> Subject: Re: Possible K2K anti-neutrino run in 2005 Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0412160854020.2474@uhhepp.phys.hawaii.edu> Dear K2K Members: While in principle anti-neutrino running is a great idea, my reaction is that it is impractical and perhaps a waste of resources due to low rates. Two months of data will amount to how many events? It is my fault for not following the discussions in which you all have doubtless discussed this issue. Can someone point me towards a report whee this is justified? Regards, John On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Chang Kee Jung wrote: > Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:35:20 -0500 (EST) > From: Chang Kee Jung <alpinist@ale.physics.sunysb.edu> > To: K2K US Members <K2K_us@nngroup.physics.sunysb.edu> > Subject: Possible K2K anti-neutrino run in 2005 > > Dear K2K US Members, > > I would like to inform you that at the K2K convener's meeting this week > we decided to endorse the proposal of an anti-neutrino run in 2005. > If approved, we will take about two months of data starting in May and > ending in July. > > The proposal requires removing the current target from the damaged Horn 1 > and installing our spare Horn 1 at the downstream of Horn 2. > > Best Regards, > Chang Kee >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Fri Dec 17 2004 - 04:03:39 JST