Re: your mail

From: R. Jeffrey Wilkes (wilkes@phys.washington.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 04:04:38 JST

  • Next message: Takanobu Ishii: "Minutes of K2K Steering Meeting 01.01.25"

    Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:04:38 -0800 (PST)
    From: "R. Jeffrey Wilkes" <wilkes@phys.washington.edu>
    Subject: Re: your mail
    Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101241057110.20603-100000@neutrino.phys.washington.edu>
    
    Dear Yoichiro:
     I agree completely with your statement. As i've said to the paper
    committee previously, length limits should not constrain our papers'
    contents, except as an order of magnitude guideline. Editors of all major
    journals have told us that they will make moderate exceptions to their
    limits for significant Super-K papers, and i have no doubt they will
    eagerly apply the same offer to the first K2K publication also. As you
    point out, PL is a simple option also.
    
    On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Yoichiro Suzuki wrote:
    > One of the reasons that those comments are not taken by the paper committee
    > is the excuse of the length limit of Physical Review Letters. If there is a
    > length problem, since this is not a PHYSICS paper, I suggest to submit this
    > paper to Physics Letters and to increase the contents to make a sufficient
    > description as a first DETCTION paper.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 25 2001 - 04:04:36 JST